« Feeling Cheated? | Main | The Funniest Thing Ever »

Spitting On Seattle

Listed in:

I haven’t written a blog post in over a month. Without being able to see my beloved Mets, I find myself somewhat devoid of things to write about. That combined with work hasn’t lessened my interest in sports, but it has cut into what comes into my head to talk about.

So I find it funny that after all this time, what compels me to write again isn’t something that has to do with my team, but with one of Zach’s.

News came out Monday about the Seattle SuperSonics, who as most people know have been in the midst of a struggle between their owner Clay Bennett and the city of Seattle over a new arena. Bennett, an Oklahoma City businessman had been rumored to be attempting to move the team to his hometown, but had claimed to be using it as an option only if a deal for a new area was not worked out. Of course it was more than just an idle threat; and many who had followed the situation with any degree of interest had begun to believe the move was inevitable.

Then news from the Journal Record in Oklahoma City broke this dandy, an interview with Aubrey McClendon, minority owner of the Sonics. Credits to Jerry Shottenkirk who may not have had any idea of the shitstorm he was about to unleash. This is a nice quote from McClendon:

“I’ve had good seats,” McClendon grinned. “I’ve now been really caught up in the excitement of the (Sonics) because there is a certain stamp of ‘we’ve arrived,’ and the people of Seattle kind of look down their nose at us and think these guys are trying to climb the civic ladder. They take pride in Seattle not needing a NBA team to be considered a world-class city. That’s probably true, they don’t. But I think for Oklahoma City to distance itself from other midsize cities, I think enthusiastic support of a well-run, successful NBA team says a lot about the spirit of this community. We’ve got a can-do spirit and we’ve got a fan base that’s turned out. This is a sports town; nobody ever knew it was a pro sports town. I think it is.”

So… apparently, he thinks Oklahoma City is a pro sports town and Seattle isn’t. His basis for this is… two years when the Sonics stunk? Well damn, I guess that means Oklahoma City is a better sports town than New York! I know those Oklahoma City fans showed more support than Knicks fans did this year! Let’s move the franchise down there based on what a few guys think and have nothing to basis it on.

The joke is that quote would be damning enough but it was followed by this travesty:

"But we didn't buy the team to keep it in Seattle; we hoped to come here," he said. "We know it's a little more difficult financially here in Oklahoma City, but we think it's great for the community and if we could break even we'd be thrilled."

So in essence, he’s saying that Oklahoma City ISN’T as good a town for basketball as Seattle. But all that be damed; they’re going to move the team anyway!

What it equates to ladies and gentlemen is simple; these guys are attempted to screw the city of Seattle out of their basketball team for NOTHING ELSE but a personal desire to see their city get a team.

Excuse my language but Who the FUCK are they?

Now before you say “they own the franchise”, yeah that’s true. But there are lots of things people could do but don’t because it is not right. We have consciences, we have hearts. We try not to, for the most part, to deliberately screw people over to get our way.

No, this is nothing new to sports. Major League Baseball committed similar travesties with the Montreal Expos, and attempted to with the Minnesota Twins. The Expos became especially notable as in the summer of 2003, the team actually had a shot at the postseason on September 1st. As a result, the Expos were drawing crowds in large numbers; but since baseball had closed off most of the stadium, only 20,000 were allowed in. Let me repeat that; baseball intentionally closed off the stadium, then moved the team complaining there was no interest.

Creating self fulfilling prophecies is lots of fun and an easy way to win an argument.

Along those lines, Bennett has continually complained the city of Seattle has not made enough of an effort to get a new arena. This story now throws that line of logic into serious doubt; how could Bennett really be negotiating with the city if he intended to move the team to Oklahoma City all along? Furthermore, if the ownership is willing to take a loss in profits just to fulfill some local agenda, then what chance did the city ever have? And why on earth should they bother to negotiate with someone who does not want to?

It’s a travesty. It’s an embarrassment. It should not happen. And that is why David Stern needs to cut this off now.

It has been an awful summer for the NBA. Anytime the integrity of your league is threatened by questions of point shaving, you’re in for a bad time. By no means is this Seattle situation worse than the Tim Donahay one, but it is just another black eye in a league that is losing credibility fast.

For years there has been a love affair with David Stern, calling him the best commissioner in sports. Now there are serious questions with that tag; starting with his handling of the brawl in Detroit nearly three years ago (amazing it was that long ago, right?), to the Phoenix/San Antonio debacle, right down to this mess with the Sonics. Stern’s credibility is at the lowest point it’s been in years. The NBA’s standing is declining and while basketball itself is too popular and too widely played a sport to fall into the same rut the NHL is in, that does not mean it can’t fall very far from the lofty heights it reached in the late 90’s.

Stern has come across as a commissioner in recent years who has focused too much on trying to dress up young black men than focus on the real problems of the league. The idea of racism has been thrown around a lot in regards to the NBA’s policy towards it’s players. This will do nothing to help dissuade people who want to continue that argument. Stern wants to enforce strict moral character codes on his majority black players, but has no desires to put the same codes on his owners, unless of course, they’re overly outspoken Mavericks.

Even if you don’t think Stern needs to do it for that reason, anyone with business sense can see this is destined for failure. In all this talk about how pro leagues NEED big markets, why on Earth would you leave one of the largest markets in the country to go to one that’s half it’s size? Furthermore if this story is correct, then even the ownership knows it’s a shitty business move. They’re just doing it because they want Oklahoma City to have a team?

Pardon my language again but ,what kind of short sighted horse shit is that?

So that’s great. They’ll lose money for five years and then when their tax incentive deals that owners get from purchasing franchises runs out, they’ll either sell the team or complain about they can’t compete in the market. Remember when the New Jersey Devils threatened to move to Nashville? Well the Devils stayed and even with the lackluster attendance, they still are in better shape financially than the Nashville Predators. The grass is rarely greener on the other side; it just looks that way.

Wait, what am I saying? The owners KNOW the grass is browner. They just don’t care right now. Five, ten years from now be damned. Frankly that’s how a lot of business today works and many workers have lost their life savings as the result. But hey, who cares about the average Joe right, so long as the guy at the top has himself covered?

Maybe David Stern won’t be commissioner of the league in ten years so he doesn’t care what kind of hell Bennett’s dreams of an Oklahoma City team actually does to the Sonics franchise down the road. But if he has any amount of love for the NBA and to see the league prosper, he should stop the move now for obvious reasons. You don’t take teams from large markets and move them to small ones. You just don’t. Not after you watched San Antonio and Cleveland draw terrible ratings because they aren’t big enough cities. And Oklahoma City is smaller than both. That says nothing about the league’s credibility with the fans which is fading faster than Mike Bibby’s career.

Major League Baseball learned the Expos could not work in San Juan because after the intial thrill, the interest gradually waned. With less spending power and fewer people, the situation became worse than Montreal. It’s questionable how the Nationals will fare in DC, since two franchises have already crashed and burned there. Does the NBA really need to try and fail with the Sonics?

This situation needs to change. As basketball fans, we should be united in trying to stop this move. You may not care about the Sonics; I admit I do because Zach is one of my best friends and I know how much he loves the franchise. But even you don’t know anyone from Seattle and weren’t enthralled by Shawn Kemp’s dominance, in video games or real life, you as a basketball fan should care.

Because this disgraceful act by Clay Bennett is a slap in the face of the fans. It shows that the whims of one man can be enough to override the wills of millions. Remember, this isn’t about money. If it were the Sonics would stay in Seattle. It isn’t about fan support; there are far worse supported franchises. It isn’t about city size. It’s about him wanting to make his dream come true, so screw everyone else, even they have been good soldiers for the last forty years.

As a sports fan I'm pissed because in the end, it could happen to my team or your team. If someone is crazy enough in the short term to take “breaking even” as a BEST case scenario, then no franchise is safe. Not the Yankees, the Cowboys, not the Redwings, not the Cubs. It’s a slippery slope. Someone needs to cut this trend off at the knees. And if David Stern won’t do it willingly, then there needs to be so much outrage that he is forced to do it. Lord knows his much maligned former sidekick Gary Bettman has twice done it in the last year and you could argue in those cases the teams could have benefited. (Argued, but not necessarily proven)

In this case you can’t even argue it.

So stop the bullshit. Give the NBA an actual positive story this offseason. Block the move. Save the Sonics in Seattle. It’s where they belong. Because in the end this move is just a bad one. It’s so repugnant that no one can find a way to dress it up to make it look good.

Not even dress code master David Stern.

See also: Clay Bennett, David Stern, NBA, Seattle SuperSonics

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.sportszillablog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/295

Comments

Ben, it's not hard to figure out: They think they're doing a public service for the Average Joes of Oklahoma City, and the quote you repeated here bears that out. Let's turn your argument on its head: Who the FUCK are you to say that OKC doesn't deserve a major pro sports team? Green Bay supports an NFL team with an unconventional arrangement. San Antonio supports a dynastic NBA team. Memphis has pro basketball. Buffalo has a hockey team AND an NFL team. Hell, New Orleans has basketball and football. Jacksonville has a pro football team... There are plenty of comparably sized media markets with pro sports teams, so it's not like they're moving the team to Peoria. You're ignoring a major element of this, that getting an NBA team would add a sense of legitimacy that OKC is a major American city, precisely as McClendon said. My personal experience is that people in San Jose feel the same way about the Sharks; it doesn't matter that San Jose has a greater population than San Francisco and Oakland, or that it's the heart of Silicon Valley, but having that franchise in town makes the city Major League just like its Bay Area neighbors to the north. We agree that an NBA team is a valuable thing beyond the moneymaking side of it, that it's a point of civic pride and character. So, exactly the reason that I feel badly for Sonics fans in Seattle is why I'd be excited if I were an Oklahoma City lifer, and why I don't think it's fair to rip these people for wanting an NBA team in their city so badly that they'd be willing to sink a lot money into it and treat it as a gift to the town. Think about it: you just ripped this guy for giving the gift of an NBA team to his city! Don't we all want team owners like that? There ought to be a better solution that makes sense for the fans in Seattle and the league as a whole (see: not expansion), but I don't have it, and you haven't presented a realistic one, either.

In short, this argument doesn't hold any water because the owners say it's a bad business move right off the bat. They say they'd be happy to break even- and that's with the incentives they get for owning a franchise in the first few years.

The Sharks are not a good example; they were an expansion team. No matter how beloved the Sharks are, if they had moved from a major market like NY, to San Jose, it would have been a bad business move. We're talking about moving a franchise that is by no means a bottom rung, garbage franchise that no one supports.


Stealing a team right under the nose of a good fan base is not my idea of goodwill.

Neither I, Sonics fans, nor the city of Seattle should need to present a solution. The problem isn't Seattle. The problem is an owner (or group of owners) who doesn't care how good the fanbase is, or how less profitable his dream will be, it's just because he wants to do it.

So maybe you can come up with a reason why a questionable fan base in OKC (and it's questionable because 2 years does not a great fanbase make, again even the owners are admitting that) deserves a team over a good fan base that has supported their team the last 40 years?

Ben, you completely missed my point. Your objection to my Sharks analogy is a straw man, because the analogy has nothing to do with being an expansion team or a team that moved there. Just having the Sharks is a HUGE point of civic pride and accomplishment, regardless of the profitability of the venture. Furthermore, your understanding of the SJ market is extremely lacking, because the Bay Area, Silicon Valley in particular, is a huge market with a very wealthy, young, fan base in place. Whatever with SJ, you have tried to deflect the argument with this "bad business move" declaration. Let me spell it out: IT DOESN'T MATTER whether they make money or not. It's not your money. They can consider it the cost of doing business, the cost of making OKC a truly major American city. Trying to convince people that OKC doesn't deserve a shot at supporting a team is utter nonsense. It's like saying that putting a hockey team in Tampa is crazy, because that would never work, let alone if they had to share Florida with another team... Anyway, your argument is preposterous and your anger misplaced. You're blasting a group for doing a civic service for the people of OKC, and for NOT sucking the money out of whomever offers more. I'll change my tune if they accept a sweetheart deal from the Seattle government, but the owners say they'll buy their way out of the current lease if they have to. What I find distasteful is not that these people want to move the team to OKC, which, by the way, was their barely veiled intention all along, but that the league went along with it. The previous owners could have done something, but it's a bit much to ask that they not accept what they think is the best offer on their investment. Oh, wait. That wouldn't be a good business move, and we can't have that, can we? The new owners said they'd try for a year to get an arena deal done, and while they probably didn't do it in good faith, they did indeed give the city a year to decide whether to fall on the sword for the sake of having an NBA team after years of screwing the franchise with a lease deal David Stern called the worst in the league, or to let these people move the team they'd bought fair and square and dreamed of moving to their hometown. They're not stealing the team. Get that through you're head. They're moving it. There's a big difference. It sucks for Seattle basketball fans, but, again, how can you blast a guy for purchasing a valuable property in Seattle and then gifting it to OKC? That's insane. In the end, you've only gotten it part right, as it's Stern and the league, not the ownership group, that deserve your ire. The league should have blocked the sale and ensured that the team went to new owners that pledged to figure out how to keep the team in the Seattle area. However, the league didn't take that action, and so we are where we are. It's shitty for Seattlites, but to rip the OKC group for this is utterly uncalled for. Think about the test you've set up: To bring a major pro sports team to a given city, one must have the desire, own the team, AND must have a guarantee of profitability. That's insane and you know it. If that's a requirement for being a good owner, then you can't call Eddie DeBartolo a good owner. You can't call Walter Haas a good owner. You can't call George Steinbrenner a good owner. However, Charles Comiskey was totally concerned with the bottom line. Now, THAT'S a good owner. The loyalty of the fan bases are irrelevant when it comes to choosing which one deserves a team more because that's not a choice. Again, it doesn't matter whether or not you think OKC can support a team; it's ridiculous to rip someone for taking the opportunity to bring major pro sports to his home city and assuming the risk.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)





Zachary Geballe
Ben Valentine
David Arnott
Imtiaz Mussa
Bryan Koch
John Schmeelk

Contact Sportszilla and the Jabber Jocks by clicking right here.







Random Non-Sports Links

Wee Demon
Bridget Budbill

Blogroll Me!

It's an extreme makeover for your blog!